Compliance

Security

6 sections
7 source tickets

Last synthesized: 2026-02-13 02:53 | Model: gpt-5-mini
Table of Contents

1. Physical workplace hazards: combustible materials and messy cabling

2 tickets

2. Third‑party desktop AI browser (Comet/Perplexity) GDPR and device-approval

1 tickets

3. Policy on browser adblocker extensions

1 tickets

4. Legitimacy check for external security awareness training email (KnowBe4)

1 tickets

5. Qualified electronic signature inquiry and vendor compatibility with authorities

1 tickets

6. Cross-border short-term remote work advisory (France)

1 tickets

1. Physical workplace hazards: combustible materials and messy cabling
95% confidence
Problem Pattern

Combustible items (bottles, cardboard, packing material) left on office floors and tangled/untidy power or data cabling under desks created fire, short-circuit and electric-shock risks during workplace safety audits and inspections in campus offices.

Solution

Combustible loads on the floor were removed and work areas were cleared; cabling was inspected and re-routed to remove clutter and eliminate short-circuit/electric-shock hazards. A small, regularly used corner of packing material was retained where disposal was not possible. Tickets were closed after the physical hazards were eliminated and work areas were confirmed tidy.

Source Tickets (2)
2. Third‑party desktop AI browser (Comet/Perplexity) GDPR and device-approval
95% confidence
Problem Pattern

A user asked whether installing and logging into the standalone desktop AI browser 'Comet from Perplexity' on a university laptop with their email address was compliant with data-protection (GDPR) and allowed on IU-managed devices.

Solution

IT reviewed the product and consulted the data protection team; the data protection team determined that Comet (the Perplexity desktop AI browser) was not data-protection/GDPR compliant for use on IU devices. The request to use/install Comet on university-managed hardware was denied and the decision was recorded.

Source Tickets (1)
3. Policy on browser adblocker extensions
90% confidence
Problem Pattern

Users reported that heavy advertising made essential websites nearly unusable and increased risk of accidental clicks to malicious content, and they asked whether installing adblocker extensions (e.g., Adblock Plus for Firefox) was permitted on university machines.

Solution

Cyber Security reviewed the query and confirmed that installation of browser add-ons from the official browser extension stores was permitted. Security recommended uBlock Origin as an example approved adblocker, while not restricting users to that single product.

Source Tickets (1)
4. Legitimacy check for external security awareness training email (KnowBe4)
90% confidence
Problem Pattern

A user received a mandatory training notification email showing an external-sender warning and was uncertain whether the message (from do-not-reply@walbrook.ac.uk with a KnowBe4 link) was a phishing attempt.

Solution

IT Security examined the message, verified the sender domain and service, and confirmed that the email was a legitimate KnowBe4 security-awareness training notification. The user was informed that the message was not a phishing attempt and was part of the organisation's training program.

Source Tickets (1)
5. Qualified electronic signature inquiry and vendor compatibility with authorities
70% confidence
Problem Pattern

A department sought to introduce qualified electronic signatures for official documents and asked whether the university already used a provider, which provider that would be, and how to ensure signatures would be accepted by external authorities (noting Adobe Sign was used internally but not listed by the Bundesnetzagentur).

Solution

No technical remediation was performed. The ticket recorded advisory findings: the need to identify which internal groups would use signatures, to determine the scale of any rollout, and to evaluate provider options. Adobe Sign was noted as in limited internal use but not listed by the Bundesnetzagentur; vendor-selection and rollout considerations were captured for follow-up.

Source Tickets (1)
6. Cross-border short-term remote work advisory (France)
85% confidence
Problem Pattern

A staff member asked whether any security measures or restrictions applied to working online from France for a short period, seeking clarity on policy and technical/security constraints for cross-border remote work.

Solution

IT advised that HR was the responsible contact for cross-border work questions and reported that there were no known technical restrictions at the time; the user was directed to consult HR for any formal approvals or employment-related requirements.

Source Tickets (1)
Back to Summaries
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload X