SharePoint

Cloud

48 sections
518 source tickets

Last synthesized: 2026-02-13 00:20 | Model: gpt-5-mini
Table of Contents

1. SharePoint permission and access fixes (Owners, Members, and group membership)

292 tickets

2. Restore and migration of Microsoft Lists and OneDrive content

13 tickets

3. Large file delivery to external vendors via SharePoint sharing

3 tickets

4. Profile attribute updates (job title) via HR and directory sync

2 tickets

5. Embedding authenticated external sites blocked by IU authentication (iframe/X-Frame)

14 tickets

6. Restore deleted SharePoint site pages from Site Pages recycle bin

21 tickets

7. SharePoint API 401 due to missing 'Bearer' prefix in Authorization header

1 tickets

8. User-specific SharePoint access failures caused by browser cache or cookies

26 tickets

9. Add external domain to SharePoint site-level allowed domains for external sharing

23 tickets

10. Add unit/metadata field to SharePoint submission list and update Power Automate emails

3 tickets

11. Hero web part configuration controls disabled due to incompatible page section layout

1 tickets

12. Duplicate submission emails caused empty-looking SharePoint upload folder

1 tickets

13. Renaming a SharePoint Communication site and performing a site URL cutover

8 tickets

14. Unwanted SharePoint bot repeatedly posting in a Microsoft Teams channel

1 tickets

15. SharePoint site navigation label rename and repositioning for discoverability

7 tickets

16. Search relevance issues and missing results in SharePoint/Microsoft Search

2 tickets

17. SharePoint site/group cannot be deleted because it's provisioned by an M365 Group / Teams team

2 tickets

18. Expiring SharePoint API client secret for third-party service (EPOS DAM)

3 tickets

19. Power Automate flow did not detect SharePoint choice/status field changes, preventing automated publish

6 tickets

20. Automated permanent deletion of student thesis submissions tied to exmatriculation date

1 tickets

21. Excel for the web link preview/activation changed after update (desktop behaved correctly)

1 tickets

22. Automated SharePoint project folder creation triggered by Jira status changes (with duplicate detection and per-folder permissions)

3 tickets

23. Adobe Acrobat failed to open or merge PDFs directly from OneDrive/SharePoint for a single user

4 tickets

24. Archiving large mailbox and many PSTs to a SharePoint document library

2 tickets

25. Provisioning a new internal SharePoint site with assigned owner and initial settings

22 tickets

26. Team wiki / knowledge base design on SharePoint and Teams

3 tickets

27. Historical SharePoint analytics/dashboard needed beyond 90-day retention

1 tickets

28. Support policy: no assistance for configuring personal devices to access SharePoint exam site

1 tickets

29. SharePoint page save/edit failures caused by invalid or missing required page metadata (Author field)

1 tickets

30. Bulk update of list/form choice fields using Edit Grid View (Quick Edit)

1 tickets

31. Loop workspaces stored in SharePoint Online instead of SharePoint Embedded containers

1 tickets

32. Access denied for specific SharePoint subpages or student records (site-level/subpage permissions)

12 tickets

33. Users expecting SharePoint for support requests but lacking access — Service Portal/Okta alternative

2 tickets

34. Intranet site provisioning and content migration issues with AvePoint (copied pages, missing images, permissions, popup blockers)

6 tickets

35. Intermittent numeric value corruption in a SharePoint list column (amount field)

2 tickets

36. Display an Office 365 Group calendar from one SharePoint site on another site page

2 tickets

37. Public/permament share link for event handouts with overwrite capability (OneDrive / SharePoint / Google Drive)

2 tickets

38. Updating in-app documentation links to new SharePoint/Intranet content

1 tickets

39. Coordinating scheduled SharePoint/Teams communications and publishing

2 tickets

40. Meeting/lecture recordings uploaded to SharePoint showed 'this video has no audio'

1 tickets

41. Limited SharePoint experience when Office Graph / Delve is disabled at tenant level

1 tickets

42. Preventing accidental edits and column schema drift in SharePoint Lists

1 tickets

43. Site storage capacity blocking uploads and form submissions

1 tickets

44. Intermittent SharePoint and Power BI platform performance degradation

1 tickets

45. SharePoint edit access requests routed through non-admin support and pending approval

5 tickets

46. Page- or site-level SharePoint access requests that support cannot grant (owner must assign)

7 tickets

47. HR network drive migration to a dedicated HR SharePoint site and site governance

1 tickets

48. SharePoint list 'Edit view' dialog failed with unexpected error; recreate list as workaround

1 tickets

1. SharePoint permission and access fixes (Owners, Members, and group membership)
95% confidence
Problem Pattern

Users experienced SharePoint-related access and visibility failures including Access Denied/403, 404 Not Found, read-only documents, missing upload/edit controls, files not appearing in Explorer/Teams upload dialogs, sync or media playback failures, sharing links that arrived late or without email notification, expired/unavailable sharing links, and unexpected Access Request emails being sent to unintended recipients. Symptoms often appeared after account/email renames, departed owners, missing or incorrect site owners or Microsoft 365/Azure AD group membership, migration path/name or channel-folder mapping changes, tenant-level app/Graph permission or Sites.Selected misconfigurations, network filtering, file/path-length or storage limits, or during SharePoint service outages. Affected systems included SharePoint Online, OneDrive, Microsoft Teams, Microsoft Stream, Microsoft 365 Groups and Azure/Entra AD, and related mail delivery via Exchange/Outlook.

Solution

Incidents were resolved by restoring correct site owners and role assignments, repairing Entra/Azure AD and Microsoft 365 group membership, and correcting migration path/name mappings so permissions propagated and owners could reapply grants. Where site owners were missing or unknown, recovery included re-establishing explicit site owners or temporarily elevating tenant-admin privileges so site-level grants and SharePoint-group reassignments could be made. Library and file access was recovered by repairing SharePoint-group membership and direct role assignments, reissuing or replacing expired sharing links, and by confirming or resetting sharing-link expiration and access scopes; SharePoint/OneDrive sharing activity and audit logs plus Exchange message-trace checks were used to verify share/upload timestamps and mail delivery when users reported delayed or missing notifications. Access-request noise was addressed by reviewing site access-request routing and recipient settings and by removing unintended approvers or adjusting group membership so only appropriate owners or delegates received requests. Service-principal and connector failures were attributed to missing application-level Graph permissions, absent admin consent, or lack of explicit site-scoped grants; remedies included applying correct application permissions (e.g., Files.Read.All, Sites.Read.All), granting Sites.Selected with explicit site assignments and tenant admin consent, or provisioning an organizational-managed service account where delegated sign-in was not supported. Third-party add-in and deployment problems were resolved by provisioning the tenant or site app-catalog in the correct scope and involving Global Admin where required; some deployments to very large site collections succeeded only when deployed from the proper app-catalog context. Upload and Explorer/Teams UI failures sometimes correlated with network filtering or inspection—these were isolated by testing on alternate networks and escalated to network teams when persistent. SitePages/navigation issues were repaired by locating moved pages, republishing drafts, removing pinned links to unpublished content, clearing held checkouts and orphaned embedded authors, and republishing. Teams/channel-folder incidents were fixed by confirming Microsoft 365 Group/Team status, reassigning group owners/members and re-binding or removing broken channel-folder mappings; folders created by departed users were deleted or reassigned when necessary. Scale and storage constraints were addressed by planning library splits or migrations for very large libraries, relocating or renaming items when path-length or file-size limits prevented sync/migration, and by shortening paths to resolve OneDrive/File Explorer sync failures. OneDrive sync problems were also corrected by removing legacy/premigration sign-ins, relinking or reinstalling clients. Automation flows that suppressed items or applied unintended permission changes were reversed and affected libraries were reindexed so search returned expected results. Media playback issues were resolved by aligning storage and permission models or migrating media to supported services. Combined application of owner/role restoration, group membership repair, reissuing/adjusting sharing links and verifying delivery via audit/mail traces, reassigning or provisioning proper app/site registrations with correct Graph/Sites.Selected permissions and admin consent, republishing/relinking pages/navigation, clearing checkouts and embedded authors, deploying app/site-catalog add-ins in correct scope, reversing harmful automation and reindexing, migration path/name remediation and correcting OneDrive client state resolved the reported Access Denied/403/404, missing UI/search/list items, sync, channel-folder and app authorization incidents in the reviewed cases.

Source Tickets (292)
2. Restore and migration of Microsoft Lists and OneDrive content
95% confidence
Problem Pattern

After SharePoint/Teams site moves, restructures, or syncs, content, membership, and access became inconsistent across SharePoint lists, Site Pages, OneDrive, OneNote, Microsoft 365 Group mailboxes, and Teams. Reported symptoms included missing or partially populated lists and student-specific records, Site Pages left on source sites or immovable Home.aspx pages, OneDrive folders reported as moved while still present on source, duplicate files after rename/transfer, migrations skipping items that referenced missing/external/student accounts, automation flows processing truncated datasets (commonly only the first 100 items), and desktop sync/File Explorer cross-tenant moves appearing to complete locally while not uploading or creating valid destination links. Users also reported broken integrations and uncertainty about bookmarks and direct links to moved SharePoint/wiki pages.

Solution

Missing or partially migrated SharePoint lists, Site Pages, OneDrive content, and broken integrations were resolved using backups, migration-export replays, vendor-assisted migrations, and targeted configuration fixes. Site Pages left on source sites were copied or restored from migration exports and unrecoverable Home.aspx pages were rebuilt in the target site. AvePoint restores and vendor replayed migrations corrected incomplete OneDrive and list transfers; Dropbox→OneDrive rename/duplication problems were resolved by re-running transfers from exports and removing duplicate copies to re-establish canonical files. Items that had been skipped because they referenced missing, external, or student accounts were reconciled either by mapping or recreating the referenced accounts/records or — when the authoritative data resided in an upstream system — by engaging the data owner (for example, the Academia team) to populate the missing student records so SharePoint lists returned expected content. An automation flow that had been paginating only the first 100 items was fixed; after it processed the full dataset, Teams membership and list records reconciled. Third‑party integrations and app references (Jira, desktop apps, approval flows) were validated and either reconnected or files were restored/recreated in expected paths. Microsoft 365 Group mailbox anomalies were traced to mailbox type and visibility settings and handled by adjusting mailbox type/permissions or converting to a shared mailbox where appropriate. Users who could access SharePoint in a browser but not via Finder/OneDrive sync had their OneDrive clients relinked and library permissions reviewed so the client could sync; client sync logs and tenant-linkage were audited where operations showed no explicit error codes. OneNote notebook ownership and locations were audited and notebooks were relocated or reassigned into the appropriate SharePoint site or user OneDrive with permissions updated. Cross-tenant file-move attempts initiated from File Explorer/desktop sync that appeared to complete locally but did not upload or create functional links in the destination tenant were remediated by performing tenant-aware migrations or vendor replay from exports, restoring canonical files in the target tenant, removing incomplete local artifacts, and recreating links/shortcuts that used destination-tenant paths so bookmarks and direct links worked. Stakeholder meetings were held to confirm expected link/bookmark behavior, clarify authoritative data owners, and align timing and scope before further migration work proceeded.

3. Large file delivery to external vendors via SharePoint sharing
90% confidence
Problem Pattern

Requesters needed a scalable way to deliver very large files (several MB to several GB, including video and SCORM) to external vendors or agencies who lacked internal SharePoint access. Requirements varied between one-way, time-limited provisioning (≈6–12 months retention) and collaborative co-editing, and sometimes involved multiple internal owners or portal-style access. Requesters were uncertain which platform (SAFE, OneDrive, SharePoint/Extranet, Teams, or third-party transfer tools) supported large files, link-based access, retention constraints, and collaborative editing. In some cases files failed to open in the SharePoint/OneDrive browser view (for example Excel files that only opened in the desktop app), causing delivery uncertainty.

Solution

Requirements were assessed and SAFE was identified as unsuitable for one-way, time-limited provisioning in this use-case. OneDrive file or folder sharing was recommended for one-way, link-based delivery that supported multi-GB files and video content with temporary retention (approximately 6–12 months). A SharePoint Extranet or a dedicated SharePoint shared site was recommended when a portal-style experience or multiple internal owners were required. For collaborative editing needs, document-specific OneDrive or SharePoint links were used and external access to the site or library was granted; third-party transient transfer tools (e.g., WeTransfer) were not used when co-editing was required. Files that exhibited browser-compatibility problems (such as Excel files that only opened in the desktop app, suspected DDE) were escalated for specialist troubleshooting and were not resolved as part of the transfer action.

Source Tickets (3)
4. Profile attribute updates (job title) via HR and directory sync
95% confidence
Problem Pattern

SharePoint showed stale user profile attributes (for example job title, display name, or surname) that did not reflect recent profile edits or directory changes. Profile updates performed through the Virtual Service Agent, local SharePoint edits, or downstream directory synchronization were not reflected on some SharePoint pages or web parts, leaving old values visible to users.

Solution

Two distinct root causes and resolutions were observed. In cases where the authoritative HR record was incorrect, the HR team updated the job-title record in the authoritative HR system and the change propagated through directory/profile synchronization; the updated title then appeared in SharePoint profiles after propagation (observed to take up to seven days). In cases where a specific SharePoint page or web-part continued to show a stale display name or surname despite profile updates, the site owner edited the SharePoint page, removed the user object entry from the list, and re-added the user object; this refreshed the displayed profile name and resolved the issue.

Source Tickets (2)
5. Embedding authenticated external sites blocked by IU authentication (iframe/X-Frame)
77% confidence
Problem Pattern

Embedded SharePoint content and SharePoint-hosted pages failed to render when placed inside external iframes or Teams Website tabs, producing blank or blocked iframe regions, generic "permission missing" iframe errors, browser console errors referencing X-Frame-Options or CSP frame-ancestors, or "... has refused to connect". Some users saw 401 UNAUTHORIZED when content was surfaced as a Teams Website tab (desktop-only) while the same content rendered in the Teams web client; other cases showed "Access denied" for specific course or LMS pages. Embeds attempted from external portals using non-Azure SSO (for example Okta) or from app-based integrations sometimes failed due to tenant/site embedding restrictions or missing app permissions.

Solution

Investigations identified several recurring root causes and what resolved each. When SharePoint blocked an external domain, tenant or site-collection administrators added the domain to SharePoint’s allowed-embedding / HTML Field Security lists and embeds then rendered across browsers. Authentication/login endpoints that returned X-Frame-Options or CSP frame-ancestors or otherwise refused framed connections were resolved by coordinating with the external service to remove or relax frame-restricting headers or by altering the authentication flow when framing remained unsupported. Classic SharePoint content surfaced as a Teams Website "Website" tab in the Teams desktop client produced 401 UNAUTHORIZED for non-owners while the same content worked in the Teams web client; these were resolved by surfacing content via a native SharePoint tab or by using the Teams web client to avoid the desktop Website-tab authentication path that differed from browser behavior. Navigation breaks caused by links rewritten by Microsoft Defender for Office 365 ('.com.mcas.ms' fragments) or other link rewriting were resolved by restoring clean direct URLs, replacing rewritten links with external-link targets or shorteners, or ensuring navigation opened in a new tab. 'Access denied' or refused-connection symptoms affecting only some users traced to Azure AD/Entra group membership, course enrollment state, or SharePoint permission inheritance and were resolved by correcting group membership, SharePoint item/page permissions, or re-enrolling users where necessary. Where the Learning Hub or specific SharePoint sites were owned by another team, incidents were escalated to that owning team (for example, Learning Hub issues were routed to people-projects@iu.org) for investigation and remediation. Attempts to embed SharePoint content from external portals using non-Azure SSO (for example Okta) were observed to be blocked by SharePoint-side restrictions; documentation referenced Azure AD app-registration scopes (Site.Read.All or Site.Selected) as relevant for app-based access, and such cases required SharePoint-side configuration or app-permission changes — in at least one USU Knowledge Center ticket no technical change was implemented.

6. Restore deleted SharePoint site pages from Site Pages recycle bin
95% confidence
Problem Pattern

Users reported SharePoint/OneDrive-hosted content (site pages, document-library files/folders, lists, Teams recordings, private‑channel files, News posts) missing or inaccessible, often returning HTTP 404, 'The item does not exist', 'File not found', or access-denied. Affected items were absent from Site Contents or Site Pages, invisible in apps, or missing from both first-stage and second-stage Recycle Bins; incidents commonly followed migrations, automated group/site removals, deletions from an owner’s OneDrive, or an owner leaving the organization, and were often accompanied by Correlation IDs or audit-log 'System' deletion entries.

Solution

Support classified each missing artifact’s state (unpublished/draft, deleted and recoverable, moved/renamed, permission- or ownership-restricted, or part of a soft-deleted site) and applied remediation matched to that state. Unpublished or draft pages were republished by site owners when appropriate and stale News webpart or Start Page entries that referenced deleted or draft items were removed to clear broken links. Deleted pages, files, folders and shared items were recovered from the appropriate recycle bin when entries existed (site-level Site Pages recycle bin, the site Recycle Bin where the file lived, or the owner’s OneDrive Recycle Bin). Entire soft-deleted SharePoint sites were restored from the tenant Deleted Sites area in the SharePoint admin center; restoring a deleted site returned its OneDrive/Teams-synced shortcuts and folder links. Version History and site versioning were reviewed and available previous versions were restored when edits caused content to appear missing; limited or absent version history prevented recovery in several cases. Support used audit logs (including 'System' deletion entries consistent with automated Teams/Microsoft 365 group/site removals) and Correlation IDs to distinguish deletions from permission issues and to trace actions. Where ownership or permission-scope changes produced access-denied or 'item does not exist' messages, remediation involved restoring the item or correcting ownership/permission scope so links and share operations succeeded. Broken or stale share links that pointed to an incorrect my.sharepoint tenant domain were corrected, after which access to OneDrive/SharePoint-hosted Teams recordings and shortcuts was restored. Agents sometimes joined users in interactive Microsoft Teams sessions to diagnose UI problems (for example a shifted navigation bar that hid the Files/Recycle Bin entry) and then navigated to the correct Teams site/SharePoint recycle bin location to recover Teams recordings. Private-channel files were checked in their separate SharePoint site collection and its recycle bin. When items were not present in any recycle bin, support documented audit-trail and backup options; Microsoft Purview or tenant-level audit searches were noted as ways to surface evidence of permanent deletion but were sometimes out of scope for the responder and required tenant-administrator or Microsoft support involvement. Items older than container retention windows were escalated to tenant administrators or Microsoft support for possible recovery. Observed retention windows in incidents were approximately 30 days for site Recycle Bins and Deleted Sites and about 93 days for Teams/OneDrive meeting recordings.

7. SharePoint API 401 due to missing 'Bearer' prefix in Authorization header
95% confidence
Problem Pattern

SharePoint API requests returned HTTP 401 Unauthorized and an odata.error (e.g. -2147024891 System.UnauthorizedAccessException) even though an access token was successfully obtained from Azure AD. Service-side tokens and secrets appeared valid but API calls were rejected.

Solution

Investigators confirmed access tokens were being issued but the HTTP Authorization header lacked the required 'Bearer ' prefix. The API calls were corrected by prepending 'Bearer ' to the access token in the Authorization header (Authorization: Bearer ), after which the SharePoint API requests succeeded.

Source Tickets (1)
8. User-specific SharePoint access failures caused by browser cache or cookies
92% confidence
Problem Pattern

A single user’s SharePoint/Teams/OneDrive experience intermittently showed missing or partial site content, stale file previews (in‑app viewers showing an older version while downloads and SharePoint version history showed the latest), ‘Unknown rendering error’ messages such as “This item is not available…”, intermittent “Access denied” responses (sometimes with a correlation‑ID), “can’t connect to the server” errors, empty search/dropdown controls, repeated sign‑in prompts, client‑side JavaScript errors, or inability to open, save, or edit items. Symptoms were confined to one user (device, browser, or app specific), lacked consistent server‑side HTTP error codes, and affected SharePoint Online, Teams file viewer, OneDrive sync, browsers, and the Teams desktop app (including macOS).

Solution

Incidents were resolved in multiple, root‑cause–specific ways. When browser or authentication state caused missing content, repeated sign‑in prompts, or client‑side errors, restoring the user’s browser/authentication state (full reloads, new browser profile or private session, signing out and signing back in, or switching browsers) made content and permissions visible; re‑authenticating with the correct account context and re‑establishing previously declined consent exposed administrator‑permission changes and hidden content. Problems that presented as empty search/dropdown controls were sometimes traced to declined consent or application business logic rather than an infrastructure fault. OneDrive sync anomalies that blocked saving or editing from File Explorer correlated with overwritten/deleted field values and inconsistent version records; removing/unlinking the OneDrive sync link restored save/edit capability — some removals failed initially but succeeded on retry during a support session. Device‑ or browser‑specific failures (mobile/tablet incompatibility, Teams desktop app anomalies on macOS) were resolved by using a different device or desktop browser or by addressing the local device state; technician‑run updates (Dell CommandUpdate/SupportAssist and BIOS update) and reboots restored responsiveness in cases traced to the local device. Local connectivity issues (intermittent router/internet disconnects or onsite WLAN problems) caused occasional “can’t connect to server” or extreme slowness and were resolved by restoring local network stability. Client‑side JavaScript errors combined with misconfigured audience‑targeted web parts had hidden broken elements until browser/auth state was cleared; intranet search or direct library access provided alternate paths when web parts or shortcuts were not visible. Specific observed patterns added by recent tickets included Teams’ in‑app file viewer returning a stale Excel preview for read‑only users while downloads and SharePoint version history showed the current file (support could not reproduce or document a consistent fix), and intermittent, user‑scoped “Access denied” incidents that surfaced correlation‑IDs and primarily affected the Teams desktop app on macOS despite correct group membership and sign‑out attempts. For ambiguous rendering errors, support validated link correctness and owner‑granted permissions; some incidents remained unresolved pending deeper correlation‑ID tracing by product support.

9. Add external domain to SharePoint site-level allowed domains for external sharing
95% confidence
Problem Pattern

SharePoint Online and connected Microsoft 365 services prevented adding or granting external/partner users access to sites or documents. Symptoms included People Picker/name search returning no results or refusing to add external users, guest invitations not being received, access‑request or access‑denied errors when following site links, and link‑sharing flows redirecting to Microsoft OAuth/login (login.microsoftonline.com) that resolved to a blank OWA stepupauth.aspx page. Guests sometimes appeared as 'Visitors' or were blocked in the site sharing UI, could not upload or move files due to insufficient permissions, or failed because of Azure AD B2B guest-account tenancy/mapping or Office 365 group membership discrepancies.

Solution

Incidents were resolved by addressing site-level sharing restrictions, Azure AD guest presence and mapping, permission scoping, People Picker/name-resolution issues, and any cross-service onboarding problems (Exchange mailbox and telephony provisioning). For SharePoint sharing failures, sites that were restricted to “Only people in your organization” were changed to allow guests or partner domains were added to the site-level allowed-domain list; where partners required isolation, dedicated SharePoint sites were provisioned. People Picker/name-resolution problems were traced to missing or variant email objects, group-based account representations, or Office 365 group membership discrepancies; these were resolved by reconciling email variants and group membership, ensuring the user existed in the tenant or was invited as an Azure AD B2B guest, and reissuing guest invites when needed. Guests who needed to upload or move files were placed into groups with Contribute/Edit permissions which restored file operations. Site owners were identified via Site settings → Site permissions so outstanding access requests could be approved. Guest-access failures were restored by re-sending invitations, performing Azure AD B2B guest invites from the partner tenant, issuing guest re‑authentication links, or using an admin invite plus the user retrying the original site link; in several cases access succeeded after a re-invite or retry even when the initial invitation email was not received. Retention and audit requirements were met by applying retention policies/archival workflows and preserving exported audit logs tied to the site. When partner licensing prevented alternate delivery (for example Power BI restrictions), SharePoint file exchange was used. Tickets that involved onboarding across services required coordination with Exchange and telephony teams; one case recorded incorrect assignment of external addresses into a shared Exchange mailbox and separate Cloudya provisioning requests, which were handled alongside enabling SharePoint access. An intermittent OAuth/OWA stepupauth.aspx blank‑page redirect was observed during link-sharing in at least one case; that occurrence ceased without recorded technical changes and was closed as resolved after recurrence did not reappear.

10. Add unit/metadata field to SharePoint submission list and update Power Automate emails
90% confidence
Problem Pattern

SharePoint lists used for operational and academic workflows contained missing or incorrectly-typed metadata (unit/type, expiry, teaching formats), free-text placeholders (e.g. '-') in place of structured values, and inconsistent item-level permissions. These issues prevented filtering, visitor-facing presentation, and time-based automations; connected PowerApps/Power Automate flows were brittle and risked breaking when list schema changed. Users reported inability to mark/designate unit types, to have per-row owners edit their items, and to receive or suppress automated expiry reminders.

Solution

Choice/metadata columns were added and normalized across affected lists and the data model was migrated so downstream tools could rely on structured values. For thesis submissions a required choice column for unit/type was created, existing items were backfilled, and Power Automate confirmation templates were corrected and updated to include the new unit/type metadata. The imported teaching-formats/exam-types table was converted to a dedicated SharePoint list and key attributes were represented as explicit choice/metadata columns; exam-type values were mapped to downstream exam tools and role indicators. Visitor-facing presentation was improved by creating filtered site views, adjusting Card/List layouts and column formatting so key fields were visible and filterable, and by adding help text where multiselect semantics required clarification. For the Awards list (IUG-Intranet-IUG-Comunications/Lists/Siegel) the expiry workflow and permissions were hardened: a new Date column was introduced and values were migrated (the legacy text column was retained temporarily to avoid breaking the connected PowerApp), the PowerApp was coordinated and updated to use the new Date column, and a boolean/no-expiry indicator was added to preserve entries that should not trigger reminders. Power Automate flows were built/updated to send automated email reminders 30 days before expiry while explicitly skipping items with the 'no expiry' flag or legacy '-' placeholder; mandatory receipt and expiry requirements were enforced on new submissions, with the no-expiry option supported. Per-item ownership was implemented by applying item-level edit permissions (breaking inheritance and granting the listed Owner appropriate rights via an automated flow) so the person in the Owner column could edit their row without exposing other sensitive data. Sensitive fields were protected by adjusting list access and by using flags/archival lists for records that required restricted visibility; an Active/Archive flag and an automated archival process were added for expired items. Changes to list schema, flows, views, and PowerApp connectors were deployed to production and applied to the relevant lists and flows.

11. Hero web part configuration controls disabled due to incompatible page section layout
90% confidence
Problem Pattern

When editing a SharePoint page, the Hero web part's controls to change number of levels (rows) and tiles (cards) were greyed out and new content could not be added, while other page elements remained editable. The page UI displayed a layout-related hint indicating a restriction preventing Hero configuration changes.

Solution

The Hero web part was moved into a site section layout that the web part supports (for example a 2/3 + 1/3 column or a full-width section). After placing the Hero web part into a compatible column/section, the previously disabled options for levels and tiles became available and the web part could be configured normally. The page edit was then saved with the supported layout.

Source Tickets (1)
12. Duplicate submission emails caused empty-looking SharePoint upload folder
90% confidence
Problem Pattern

An instructor saw a student's SharePoint submission folder as empty while the student reported files were uploaded. The student had received two submission notification emails (different dates) with different folder links; one email's submission overview was populated and the other showed an empty overview. The student also reported an error when opening one of the folder links. Affected system: Microsoft SharePoint; symptoms: empty folder view, duplicated submission notifications and a broken link.

Solution

Support verified the student’s uploads using screenshots and the downloaded submission overview and discovered two submission notification emails/links. One of the emails pointed to the correct upload folder that contained all submitted files, while the other link showed an empty folder. The instructor opened the correct upload folder and located the thesis files, resolving the incident.

Source Tickets (1)
13. Renaming a SharePoint Communication site and performing a site URL cutover
90% confidence
Problem Pattern

SharePoint Online communication/intranet sites experienced mismatches after renames or site-URL cutovers: display-name, site-URL, or start-page didn’t match expected locations, and draft homepages sometimes lived at different URLs than the assigned start/home site. Navigation links pointed to wrong locations, and updated display names or navigation labels were not immediately visible for some users (client/browser caching or propagation delays). Renames sometimes left internal component labels (for example controller names or internal list identifiers) visible and caused uncertainty about breaking references. Stakeholders also reported concerns whether intranet changes would affect Microsoft Teams-connected team sites and whether large SharePoint lists would degrade in performance as they grew.

Solution

Site display names and site URLs were changed to the requested new names and adjusted to point to the replacement or parent site where required. When a draft homepage lived at a different URL, SitePage content was moved into the parent site, the parent site was set as the start/home site, the page was published, and visitor groups and permissions were restored. Intranet/navigation labels and navigation links were updated to match the renamed site and point to the correct URL, and navigation ownership was handed to the business unit for ongoing link updates. The technician coordinated the cutover with stakeholders (a Teams meeting) and verified the changes. Visibility anomalies were attributed to propagation and client/browser caching; clearing caches or refreshing/rebooting clients resolved delayed name or navigation label updates for affected users. It was confirmed that communication/intranet sites were separate from Microsoft Teams-connected team sites and their Files libraries, so moving or disabling an intranet page did not affect team-internal Teams folder structures. Exchange mail-distribution sender display names were updated and verified. Remaining internal elements (for example visible controller or internal list names) were identified and documented as distinct from display names; technicians checked for references (Power Automate flows, SPFx/custom code, forms/dataverse integrations and list internal names) and deferred renaming until dependencies were verified to avoid breaking links. List growth was assessed — the tenant showed performance degradation in testing as lists approached roughly 2,000 items — and redesign or migration options for large lists were discussed with stakeholders.

14. Unwanted SharePoint bot repeatedly posting in a Microsoft Teams channel
95% confidence
Problem Pattern

A non-default SharePoint bot repeatedly posted the same message several times per day in a Microsoft Teams channel ('IU-CM-Nordrhein-Westfalen Regionalgruppe'), causing multiple users (students) to report spammy bot messages. The offending app had been added to the team by an individual and was generating frequent automated messages. Affected systems included Microsoft Teams and the SharePoint bot application.

Solution

The offending app ('SharePoint Bot S1') was identified and removed from the Teams channel/group. The channel was monitored for recurrence and no new bot messages were observed after removal. Historical bot messages were not deleted as part of the action.

Source Tickets (1)
15. SharePoint site navigation label rename and repositioning for discoverability
90% confidence
Problem Pattern

SharePoint/intranet navigation entries or site pages were missing, mislabeled, shown as raw content instead of links, placed under incorrect parent sections, or repeatedly disappeared/reverted. In some sites (for example FAQ/lists) pages were not visible in the default overview because web parts paginated or hid items behind a 'show all' control, causing users to assume pages were deleted. Affected systems included SharePoint communication and team sites, the corporate intranet/CMS and linked Microsoft Teams groups. Symptoms included absent or invisible menu headings, missing direct tabs/links, menu items displayed directly on pages rather than as links, navigation edits not appearing in activity logs, and hidden page entries that required explicit expansion to view. Users reported inability to locate pages or spaces and requested clearly labeled, directly accessible links or visible pagination cues.

Solution

Navigation and homepage links were updated to restore discoverability and stabilize site navigation. Specific actions included renaming menu entries and repositioning them under appropriate parents; adding the Leadership Space as a direct tab/link to its SharePoint site and surfacing it alongside the IUG Leadership Team in Microsoft Teams; adding a Lecturer Info Point link to the intranet homepage after routing via the homepage contact and handing implementation to the responsible owner; creating a SharePoint site for Team Academic Administration and adding its navigation entry under Rektorat while notifying the requester about possible addition to the Intranet Hub; and converting Fleet Management’s Sonderformen Mobilität display into a stable link to the SharePoint page containing explanatory videos. For navigation instability where links disappeared or reverted unexpectedly, activity logs and edit histories were reviewed (initially not showing the editor), site and intranet permissions and visitor/editor role assignments were audited, browser-cache and publishing behaviors were checked, and navigation entries were re-added and re-published or converted to stable link items. For FAQ/page-visibility reports where pages were hidden from the default overview, the issue was escalated to the specialist SharePoint team and a Teams meeting was proposed for further analysis; no immediate technical fix was applied in the ticket. Requesters and relevant content owners/stakeholders were informed of all changes and escalations.

16. Search relevance issues and missing results in SharePoint/Microsoft Search
95% confidence
Problem Pattern

SharePoint / Microsoft Search returned incorrect or missing results for common queries: relevant site pages or external targets were not surfaced while unrelated documents or empty lists were promoted. Some queries returned documents instead of the intended site pages and external BrandHub content could not be surfaced directly in SharePoint search. Depublished or checked-out pages sometimes remained discoverable in the intranet search, causing stale or incorrect visibility of archived content.

Solution

Search relevance and missing-result issues were mitigated by deploying Microsoft Search bookmarks (keyword promotions) to steer problematic queries to the intended site pages and external targets, and by adjusting content-level signals (titles, metadata) to improve ranking. The team documented that legacy Query Rules / query elevation were deprecated and that external BrandHub sites could not be surfaced directly in SharePoint search, so bookmarks/promotions and content changes were used as workarounds. An additional issue was observed where depublished or checked-out pages remained discoverable via the intranet search; this behavior was logged and investigated as a search/indexing visibility problem, but no final remediation was recorded in the ticket set.

Source Tickets (2)
17. SharePoint site/group cannot be deleted because it's provisioned by an M365 Group / Teams team
95% confidence
Problem Pattern

A user could not delete a SharePoint group/site even though listed as owner; deletion did not proceed and no specific error code was given. The site/group was provisioned as part of a Microsoft 365 Group (tied to a Microsoft Teams team), preventing individual deletion of the site/group.

Solution

Investigation confirmed the SharePoint site/group was provisioned by an M365 Group (a Teams team) and therefore could not be deleted independently. The user removed the associated Microsoft Teams team, which deleted the underlying M365 group and removed the linked SharePoint site. It was also noted and communicated that, when deletion of the entire group is not acceptable, the alternative is to clear or relocate the document library contents instead.

Source Tickets (2)
18. Expiring SharePoint API client secret for third-party service (EPOS DAM)
95% confidence
Problem Pattern

Third-party services using the SharePoint API (for example EPOS DAM, JungleMail, Salesforce Care) experienced authentication failures when Azure AD client secrets or API tokens expired. Symptoms included HTTP 500 Internal Server Error responses for SharePoint links in Salesforce, authentication or connection warnings and informational messages about SharePoint app/connection type, and loss or risk of access to SharePoint resources (failed newsletter sends, blocked file access).

Solution

Expired SharePoint API credentials were renewed or replaced for each affected integration. For the EPOS DAM integration a new Azure AD SharePoint app registration and client secret were created; the new client ID/secret were recorded in the team's credential store and communicated to EPOS DAM service owners so authentication continued without interruption. JungleMail connections were changed to the "Advanced" connection type on 2026-01-12; a user confirmed successful login on 2026-01-14 and the Advanced connection setting was applied for all JungleMail users, restoring newsletter delivery access. For Salesforce (Care) the CPC team renewed/restored SharePoint API access by re-enabling the API token, after which SharePoint links in Salesforce returned content and student file access was restored. Credentials, connection contexts, and the applied changes were documented with the relevant service owners.

19. Power Automate flow did not detect SharePoint choice/status field changes, preventing automated publish
76% confidence
Problem Pattern

Power Automate flows triggered by SharePoint sometimes failed to detect or record specific column changes or to create/update list entries (choice/status, date/deadline, or secondary-assessment records), causing downstream actions such as file/folder moves, publishes, permission grants or notification emails not to run. Flow runs often appeared at expected times but conditional actions aborted or stalled without explicit error codes; some submissions never appeared in SharePoint lists or libraries. Failures clustered during high-volume/bulk submissions and during Microsoft service outages; corrupted or incomplete flow/log entries and run-history retention limits (older than 30 days) sometimes prevented post-mortem analysis.

Solution

Detection and missing-entry incidents were resolved by moving flows away from relying solely on the trigger and instead using explicit version-change detection. Versioning was enabled on the affected SharePoint libraries and lists and flows used the 'Get changes for an item or a file (properties only)' action to compare current and previous versions and confirm whether the specific column (for example Status/choice fields, deadline/date columns, or assessment-result fields) had changed to the target value; conditional logic proceeded only when that exact column change was detected. This version-change approach was applied across choice/status, date/deadline and automated-sharing flows and restored downstream actions (publish/move, permission grants and notification emails) in subsequent runs. Separately, several incidents traced to Microsoft service outages or to high-volume processing had produced corrupted or incomplete flow/log entries; investigators repaired corrupted logs where possible and restored flow-run reliability. In cases where SharePoint-triggered sharing or recording flows did not run and no immediate technical fix was available, affected folders or list items were shared or corrected manually and some tickets remained unresolved due to insufficient run-history (older than 30 days) or inconclusive logs.

20. Automated permanent deletion of student thesis submissions tied to exmatriculation date
65% confidence
Problem Pattern

Legal requirements demanded automated permanent deletion of student Design Thesis submissions five years after the student's exmatriculation, but the exmatriculation date was often entered later by administration and the student system (Care) was due to be replaced by EPOS. The solution needed to avoid manual multi-team operations, ensure deletions were irrecoverable from SharePoint recycle bins, keep deletion audit records, and work across changing upstream systems and credentials.

Solution

A scheduled automation process was implemented that reconciled thesis submissions with authoritative exmatriculation dates and enacted permanent deletion only when the five-year threshold had been reached. The design used a dedicated service account (secured in 1Password/SAFE) and a scheduled Power Automate flow that looked up exmatriculation dates from the student data feed (initially via Care exports, with EPOS integration planned) and matched by student ID. Before deleting, the flow recorded immutable deletion metadata (student ID, file path, original submission date, exmatriculation date, deletion timestamp, and operator service account) into a secure audit store. Files were removed from the library and then purged from the site recycle bin using SharePoint REST calls to ensure they were not recoverable; the audit records were retained separately to satisfy logging requirements. Access to the tool was limited to the dedicated service account and automated processes to reduce human error, and backups/retention policies were reviewed to avoid conflicts with permanent deletion.

Source Tickets (1)
21. Excel for the web link preview/activation changed after update (desktop behaved correctly)
85% confidence
Problem Pattern

After a recent update, Excel workbooks hosted on SharePoint and opened in Excel for the web (Office Online) displayed link previews offset/shifted and hyperlinks would not open with a normal click (they only opened with Ctrl+Click). The same workbook opened in Excel Desktop exhibited normal single-click link behavior. Affected systems included SharePoint-hosted Excel, Excel Web/Office Online, Excel Desktop, and associated integrations like Turnitin.

Solution

The issue was resolved by opening the workbook in the Excel Desktop application instead of using Excel for the web; hyperlinks and previews behaved normally in the desktop app. The support session ended after the desktop verification and the temporary file sharing with the technician was revoked.

Source Tickets (1)
22. Automated SharePoint project folder creation triggered by Jira status changes (with duplicate detection and per-folder permissions)
80% confidence
Problem Pattern

Manual SharePoint content and metadata management driven by external systems (Jira, Microsoft Teams, SiteFusion) caused inconsistent or missing artifacts: duplicated folders or files when multiple triggers fired, inconsistent or missing per-folder permissions for leads/members and external collaborators, missing authoritative membership data in SharePoint lists, and time-consuming manual publication uploads (two PDFs) requiring folder detection and backups. Users reported duplicated creations, absent role assignments, missing group membership in lists, and operational delays during publication workflows.

Solution

Multiple automated flows and integrations removed manual steps and prevented duplication, ensured consistent naming/targets, maintained per-item permissions, and synchronized membership data. For Jira-triggered project workspaces a Power Automate flow was used (triggered by the Jira webhook/connector) that treated the Jira issue key as the canonical identifier, checked SharePoint for an existing folder (or consulted a lightweight SharePoint list recording created folders) to avoid duplicate creation, created the project folder and nine standardized subfolders, and then broke inheritance and applied role assignments so project leads received Full Control and members received Contribute. Internal principals were resolved via Azure AD identifiers and external collaborators were provisioned by issuing guest invitations before permission assignment. Where the built-in connector lacked role-assignment capability, SharePoint HTTP/REST actions or Microsoft Graph calls were used. For group membership needs a scheduled Power Automate flow retrieved Microsoft Teams group member data and populated/updated a SharePoint list to provide an authoritative membership source for downstream permissions and reporting. For publication automation an interface between SiteFusion and SharePoint determined target folders by publication type and course code, detected existing files by naming conventions, created a _BackUp folder when missing and moved matched existing files into it, then uploaded the current Print PDF and E‑PDF. That integration used the SiteFusion API where available and an RPA approach (UiPath) when direct APIs were impractical. Cross-cutting practices included using canonical identifiers (issue keys, course codes) or naming-pattern detection to prevent duplicates, lightweight existence records to make flows idempotent, and scripted REST/Graph calls when connector actions were insufficient.

Source Tickets (3)
23. Adobe Acrobat failed to open or merge PDFs directly from OneDrive/SharePoint for a single user
61% confidence
Problem Pattern

One or a few users could not open or merge files stored in OneDrive/SharePoint when using local OS clients, producing errors referencing temporary/mismatched paths, access failures, or long-path (MAX_PATH) warnings. On Windows the client-side errors often involved Acrobat/Reader and OneDrive sync path warnings; on macOS Finder reported files as ‘damaged or corrupt’ for synced SharePoint files. In other incidents the file failed to open in both the desktop app and the web/Excel Online interface, indicating possible server-side file corruption. The failures were typically isolated to specific user environments or specific files while other users or web/Teams previews were sometimes unaffected.

Solution

Incidents matched two distinct causes and were resolved differently. Client-side integration failures: Windows cases involved Acrobat/Reader interacting poorly with OneDrive long paths; resolution included replacing the Acrobat/Reader installation and relocating/shortening the user's synced folder to remove OneDrive long-path (MAX_PATH) warnings, after which Acrobat/Reader could open and merge PDFs directly from the synced location. macOS (Monterey) cases presented as Finder reporting synced SharePoint files as damaged; affected users regained access by opening the site/folder and files from the SharePoint web interface rather than via the synced Finder path. Throughout troubleshooting, browser and Teams previews remained usable alternatives for affected users. File-level corruption: some tickets described files that failed to open in both the desktop application and the web/Excel Online interface (suggesting server-side file damage); these incidents were treated as file-specific corruption rather than client integration failures. In at least one matched ticket no definitive remediation was recorded for the suspected corrupted file.

24. Archiving large mailbox and many PSTs to a SharePoint document library
95% confidence
Problem Pattern

A primary system (Exchange mailbox approaching quota or a third‑party document SaaS such as d.velop) held very large volumes (tens of GB up to TB and five‑digit document counts) that needed to be exported into a SharePoint document library for long‑term retention. Users required preservation of source attributes/metadata and multi‑year retention; connectors or vendor integrations sometimes lacked download or batch‑export actions, creating constraints for automated migration and requiring API‑driven, paged or staged extraction methods.

Solution

A dedicated SharePoint site with a document library was established as the agreed archive target in both mailbox/PST and third‑party document scenarios. For Exchange/mailbox migrations the support team documented multiple practical migration options that were used: mailbox exports and PST exports, PST→EML/MSG conversion approaches for item‑level upload, and automated transfer patterns using Power Automate or group mailbox export where appropriate to the required retention and access model. For the d.velop SaaS case the team recorded that the Power Automate d.velop connector did not provide a download action; they investigated the d.velop DMS API and supplier export capabilities and documented an API‑driven approach. The documented d.velop approach included extracting source metadata and mapping it to SharePoint columns (with unmappped attributes preserved as JSON if needed), using paged and differential export patterns to handle five‑digit document counts, and batching/parallelizing transfers while respecting API throttling. Where direct extraction to SharePoint was impractical for volume or performance reasons, the team recommended staging via Azure Blob Storage or similar, then ingesting into the SharePoint library. The solution set preserved key details needed for long retention (10 years), searchability, and future lookup, and provided the supportable transfer patterns (manual exports, automated flows, or API batch exports) appropriate to each source system and constraints.

Source Tickets (2)
25. Provisioning a new internal SharePoint site with assigned owner and initial settings
91% confidence
Problem Pattern

Requests to provision, rename, relocate, or restructure internal SharePoint or Communication sites, Teams‑connected workspaces, pages, or site URLs. Requests often included creating or configuring team document libraries (including libraries that must be manually managed or must not be automatically updated by files posted in Teams), adding named owners/members, or applying nonstandard visibility or permission combinations. Requesters frequently asked to migrate content from OneDrive, on‑prem fileshares or third‑party sources and whether pages, lists, images, and web parts would remain intact. No actionable system error codes were reported.

Solution

New internal SharePoint and Communication sites, Teams‑connected workspaces, and team document libraries were provisioned to requester specifications and placed under the requested intranet sections or URLs; site and library links were provided to requesters and assigned owners. Where requesters required a dedicated document library that was managed manually (not auto‑updated by files posted in Teams), teams or libraries were created and configured to preserve manual management behavior; when a new Team was the simplest host for the library, a Team was created and named per request. Owners and site administrators were assigned admin rights when needed to populate content or manage access; requested members or groups were added and self‑join links were provided where appropriate. Visibility and security were set according to the request, including restricting access to managed groups and implementing nonstandard permission combinations (for example read+upload). Sites, libraries and workspaces were published/activated and added to intranet hub/global navigation when requested; naming and URL conventions (including organization prefixes such as IUG‑...) were applied for backups and policy checks. Requirement‑gathering meetings and owner walkthroughs, including live Teams demos, were scheduled or delivered to confirm expectations for site structure, permissions, and document collaboration. For content and page migrations, library content, images and PDFs were migrated and made available in the target site; where AvePoint or similar tooling was used, page moves were coordinated and scheduled with stakeholders. Complex or custom page elements routinely required post‑migration work: embedded SharePoint lists, SPFx or third‑party/custom web parts, and some configured widgets often needed re‑linking, reconfiguration, or recreation after migration; these limitations and remediation steps were documented and pilot/draft sites were staged for stakeholder review. For integrations and automated ingestion, dedicated service accounts were created and existing Microsoft Forms ownerships and Power Automate flows that ran under legacy/service accounts were reassigned or reconfigured; when content arrived from third‑party FTP providers or scanner/printer devices, document libraries were prepared, scanner/printer capabilities for direct scan‑to‑SharePoint were verified, and permissions or service account handoffs for network printers were arranged as required. Related shared mailboxes were created and follow‑up CareReport tickets were recorded where applicable. When further configuration details were requested, follow‑up calls or consultations were offered and documented outcomes were recorded in the ticket.

26. Team wiki / knowledge base design on SharePoint and Teams
85% confidence
Problem Pattern

Users and teams stored reference information in ad-hoc places (Excel lists, OneDrive, and multiple SharePoint sites) that became unmanageable and hard to find. Requesters sought a team- or department-wide searchable wiki/knowledge base and sometimes a dedicated intranet page for cross-department access. Users could not find the classic SharePoint 'Wiki' app and were unsure how to create an organized, searchable wiki-like area or move existing pages between sites. Affected systems included SharePoint site pages, site libraries, Microsoft 365 (Excel) and the intranet/workspace pages.

Solution

A production rollout of a single team-wide wiki was cancelled and no enterprise wiki was deployed. Support advised that the classic SharePoint 'Wiki' app was deprecated and recommended using modern SharePoint Site Pages (the Site Pages library) for wiki-like content; a requested page was copied from the Central Program Services site to the program site and confirmed working. For information stored in Excel and other fragmented sources, support arranged and held a requirements-gathering meeting (22.10.2024) in which a consultant presented implementation options combining SharePoint and other Microsoft 365 tools and captured clarifying requirements (for example target audience — students, staff, or both — and whether a dedicated intranet page was required). Preparatory design work evaluated a document-library-based wiki pattern using taxonomy managed in the SharePoint Term Store, leveraging crawled/managed properties and SharePoint search/indexing for filtering and search. Candidate components identified during design included a custom filter web part and the existing 'auronet Wiki Contents' app. Further design improvements and planning were deferred to a later quarter.

Source Tickets (3)
27. Historical SharePoint analytics/dashboard needed beyond 90-day retention
80% confidence
Problem Pattern

Owner wanted a filterable analytics dashboard for a SharePoint site that showed all historical tracking data since site creation and daily-updated per-article metrics (unique clicks, rank by clicks, comments, dwell/read time), but built-in 'Website usage' only retained 90 days and news exports were limited to 7 days.

Solution

The support team confirmed that the built-in SharePoint/website-usage analytics and news export could not produce the requested historical, per-article metrics beyond their retention windows. The ticket documented that achieving the requirement would require external data consolidation via programmatic access (for example using Microsoft Graph / usage reports or Office 365 audit logs) or a third‑party analytics solution; the work was classified outside of the support scope (wont-do) and the ticket was closed.

Source Tickets (1)
28. Support policy: no assistance for configuring personal devices to access SharePoint exam site
95% confidence
Problem Pattern

User asked for help configuring a personal iPad (with Apple Pencil) to access the SharePoint 'IUC EXAMS' site for grading exams from a private device.

Solution

Support declined to assist because the request involved a private/personal device outside the team's supported device policy. The ticket was closed as Done with the support response that configuration of personal devices was not supported.

Source Tickets (1)
29. SharePoint page save/edit failures caused by invalid or missing required page metadata (Author field)
90% confidence
Problem Pattern

Users were unable to save edits or add documents to a SharePoint Site Pages page; edit attempts failed after another user left the page in edit mode and closing the other user's edits did not help. Errors varied by browser (Edge, Safari) and affected pages on the site pages library (CPG_Human_Resource). The page's metadata appeared to be missing or contained an unexpected Author value tied to a former employee, preventing the page from being saved.

Solution

The issue was resolved by correcting the page's Site Pages metadata: the Author field value referencing a former employee was cleared/replaced with a valid account, after which the page could be saved and edited successfully in multiple browsers. The fix targeted the missing/invalid required attribute on the specific page in the CPG_Human_Resource Site Pages library.

Source Tickets (1)
30. Bulk update of list/form choice fields using Edit Grid View (Quick Edit)
90% confidence
Problem Pattern

Users needed to change the Status (choice) field of many SharePoint forms/records to "Published" but were manually opening each item because there was no right-click context-menu action to set the status. No error messages; the symptom was inefficient, repetitive manual editing across many records.

Solution

The issue was resolved by using SharePoint's Edit Grid View (Quick Edit) / multi-select editing to perform bulk updates to the Status choice field rather than attempting to use a right-click context menu. Records were selected in grid view and the Status column was updated en masse to "Published," eliminating the need to open each form individually.

Source Tickets (1)
31. Loop workspaces stored in SharePoint Online instead of SharePoint Embedded containers
70% confidence
Problem Pattern

Loop workspaces created on 2024-04-01 were found in SharePoint Online site storage rather than in SharePoint Embedded containers as intended. Affected workspaces appeared in tenant SharePoint storage (no explicit errors), representing misplacement of storage location for Loop content and potential configuration drift.

Solution

The affected Loop workspaces were identified and relocated into the intended SharePoint Embedded containers. Administrators enumerated the impacted workspace IDs, corrected the tenant/site storage configuration that determined Loop provisioning, and migrated the listed workspaces into the Embedded container locations. Post-migration checks confirmed the workspaces resided in the Embedded containers and that ownership/permissions were retained.

Source Tickets (1)
32. Access denied for specific SharePoint subpages or student records (site-level/subpage permissions)
91% confidence
Problem Pattern

Users could not open or upload files for specific SharePoint sites, subpages, document libraries, or folders (including api.iu.org links) when following links from Salesforce, Teams (Files tab), Care, or direct URLs. Affected requests returned AccessDenied.aspx, generic permission errors, or failed to load without explicit error codes; failures were isolated to particular resources and often blocked Salesforce uploads or Teams file views. Incidents commonly followed tenant/accounting/group-membership changes, metadata-driven copy/sync automations that preserved original ACLs, or occurred on Teams-backed sites with incorrect site-level permission configuration.

Solution

Investigations found the affected SharePoint resources used permission scopes the requesting users did not have. Central IT or the site owner granted the missing scopes at the appropriate level (site, subpage, document library, or folder/DAM) and, in several cases, support applied access for the requester and relevant colleagues; after the permissions were applied users regained access and Salesforce/Teams/Care document views or uploads succeeded. Where a site owner governed the area, central support identified and engaged that owner because central support could not change those scopes directly. In one Fleet Management incident a metadata-driven automation that copied documents from a Teams channel preserved original access restrictions; resolution combined correcting the automation's copy/permission behavior and adjusting site-level permissions on the Teams-backed site (which had lacked intranet navigation and correct permission configuration). Several incidents followed billing/accounting or group-membership/tenant changes and were resolved either by administrative fixes or by automatic tenant/group sync restoring permissions. Permission changes typically required about 5–10 minutes to propagate. It was observed repeatedly that Teams channel visibility did not imply file-level SharePoint access because SharePoint enforces file/folder permissions separately from Teams channel membership.

33. Users expecting SharePoint for support requests but lacking access — Service Portal/Okta alternative
95% confidence
Problem Pattern

External staff (lecturers/partners/freelancers) reported they could not access internal SharePoint sites and expected to use SharePoint to open support requests or to host/share files for Freelancer/Partner Hubs. Symptoms included unreachable SharePoint links and uncertainty whether external employees had access or how to share documents externally. Affected systems: SharePoint, Freelancer Hub, Partner Hub; no specific error codes were reported.

Solution

Support clarified that submitting IT support tickets did not require SharePoint access and that users who could not reach SharePoint were directed to the Service Portal (accessible via myCampus or the Okta dashboard); the Okta URL was provided as an alternative route for opening tickets. For file-sharing needs involving external lecturers, support recommended creating a dedicated SharePoint site with external sharing enabled and bespoke permissions so links in the Freelancer/Partner Hubs worked for external users. Support noted that external users did not have access to internal SharePoint sites by default and offered to create and assist with the new site and its permission configuration.

Source Tickets (2)
34. Intranet site provisioning and content migration issues with AvePoint (copied pages, missing images, permissions, popup blockers)
85% confidence
Problem Pattern

AvePoint migrations of SharePoint Online intranet/hub content sometimes reported success while skipping, copying instead of moving, or partially transferring content. Symptoms included missing or empty folders and subfolders, individual files (notably .pptx) that failed without appearing in the tool's failed list, images and wiki content lost in transfer, and destination users lacking expected edit rights. Multilingual/default-language mismatches produced immutable defaults and intermittent page rendering/content-mapping errors where subpages rendered blank or showed other pages' content. Large document libraries caused very long runtimes and the Content Manager client showed compatibility issues on macOS; news links intermittently failed in browsers with popup blocking enabled.

Solution

A new SharePoint intranet hub/site was provisioned with the requested English default when the original site had German set as the immutable default; content migration was performed using AvePoint (Content Manager or Online Services) during approved backup windows. When migration jobs reported success but produced skipped, copied, or partially transferred content, technicians inspected and corrected job configuration/checkbox options and re-ran targeted migrations; items that were copied instead of moved were re-executed as move-not-copy jobs or re-migrated selectively. Instances where the tool showed aggregate moved counts but individual files (including .pptx) failed without appearing in the failed list were resolved by re-running the migration for the affected folders, re-migrating failed file types individually, or performing manual transfers for a small set of stubborn files; locked/checked-out files and conflicting placeholder folders were identified as causes and cleared or renamed before retrying. Missing subfolders and folders that appeared to exist but were empty were restored by re-executing the specific folder migration or manually copying content after removing destination-name conflicts. Pages with blank or wrong content rendered intermittently during migration were refreshed and, where necessary, remigrated; flagged wiki content was relocated into the Knowledgebase area and missing images were restored manually. Ownership and full edit permissions were granted to the requested users on destination sites. Large libraries with extensive file/version histories were migrated off-hours or on weekends and, where appropriate, executed as move-not-copy jobs to reduce runtime. Content Manager client failures on macOS were avoided by running migrations from Windows or via AvePoint Online. News-link failures were traced to browser popup blockers and were resolved by enabling popups in affected browsers. A follow-up appointment was scheduled to refine destination content and the original site was renamed to a temporary name pending final content decisions.

35. Intermittent numeric value corruption in a SharePoint list column (amount field)
70% confidence
Problem Pattern

A numeric amount column in a SharePoint list intermittently changed entered values by appending an extra zero or otherwise inflating the number (e.g., 20 → 200, 45 → 450). The behavior affected only the amount column, occurred inconsistently across entries and users, and produced no explicit error codes or messages. The issue was observed in SharePoint lists and sometimes appeared reproducible but lacked a consistent trigger.

Solution

Support inspected the affected SharePoint list and mitigated the issue by restricting the numeric amount column's maximum allowed value to 200 via the column settings; after the max-value limit was applied the erroneous value inflation stopped for the impacted list. A separate, similar report recorded no final fix; that report documented diagnostic leads including mismatches in number-format/decimal-separator or locale/regional settings and the possibility of external automation (Power Automate) modifying the field. Both the applied max-value restriction (which prevented further incorrect values in the examined case) and the noted diagnostic leads were retained as unique resolution/triage knowledge.

Source Tickets (2)
36. Display an Office 365 Group calendar from one SharePoint site on another site page
70% confidence
Problem Pattern

User wanted calendar entries hosted in a SharePoint Office 365 / M365 Group calendar to appear on a different SharePoint site page. They were unsure whether cross‑site calendar display was supported, whether they had sufficient read permissions, and who owned or was responsible for the destination site. When they tried using an M365 Group calendar/web part, each entry caused Teams channel posts and Outlook email invites, producing unwanted notifications; no explicit error messages were shown.

Solution

Cross‑site calendar display was resolved by using one of two approaches depending on the desired behavior: (1) For a modern, Group‑backed calendar view the team treated the source as an M365 Group calendar, confirmed group ownership, added the destination site owners as members of that M365 Group to grant read access, and placed the Group Calendar web part on the target modern page. Site ownership ambiguity was cleared by reviewing the target site’s Site Permissions pane and updating the Site Owners list so a responsible owner could approve the display. (2) When the M365 Group calendar produced unwanted Teams channel posts and Outlook invites, the team created and configured a legacy SharePoint calendar in the SharePoint Classic Experience and embedded that calendar on the target page; the classic calendar was not tied to the M365 Group and avoided channel messages and meeting‑invite emails. Support staff also scheduled a meeting with the requestor to clarify requirements and perform the configuration collaboratively.

Source Tickets (2)
37. Public/permament share link for event handouts with overwrite capability (OneDrive / SharePoint / Google Drive)
80% confidence
Problem Pattern

Users needed a stable public URL for event handout PDFs that allowed replacing file content without changing the published link. They were unsure which service (SharePoint, OneDrive, Google Drive, website hosting) would preserve the same shared URL and whether anonymous public access was permitted by organizational policies.

Solution

Support evaluated SharePoint, OneDrive for Business (SharePoint-backed), and Google Drive and provided options based on tenant capabilities. Where tenant/site external sharing was enabled, a SharePoint document library or OneDrive for Business had been used to create anonymous share links; replacing the file by uploading a new file with the same filename preserved the original public link. Google Drive also preserved a stable shareable URL when a new version was uploaded to the same file via its Manage Versions feature. Personal OneDrive accounts were noted as less suitable for official public distribution. In cases where organizational tenant policies disabled anonymous external sharing, SharePoint was ruled out and the Website Team hosted the handouts on a public web location so CRM email links could point to a central permanent URL. The team had also assessed audience and data sensitivity (public, non-sensitive slides) and determined that secure-file channels like SAFE were not appropriate for publicly distributed event handouts.

Source Tickets (2)
38. Updating in-app documentation links to new SharePoint/Intranet content
90% confidence
Problem Pattern

An application (Kompetenz-App) was linking to an outdated user guide on the intranet/SharePoint site; users saw the old content and the app needed to point to a newly created guide. No error messages were reported — the issue was a content/link update required in the app configuration.

Solution

The team uploaded the new guide to the team's SharePoint/Intranet page and provided the direct SharePoint link to support. Developers updated the app configuration so the button pointed to the new SharePoint link, and a new app version containing the updated link was released and confirmed available.

Source Tickets (1)
39. Coordinating scheduled SharePoint/Teams communications and publishing
90% confidence
Problem Pattern

Requests to publish SharePoint News posts and coordinated Teams announcements on specific future dates where there were no access or software errors. Common symptoms included uncertainty about who must create the News post, what content was required, and who was responsible for scheduling and publishing; stakeholder review and publication logistics were not clarified.

Solution

When publication responsibilities were clear, stakeholders reviewed and approved the communication and IT published the message to the designated Teams channel or SharePoint News area on the agreed date (for example, aligned with a newsletter release). When ownership or content responsibility was unclear, IT confirmed the responsible team or person who must create the News post, advised that all post content needed to be prepared by that owner, and offered a 30‑minute walkthrough for creating and scheduling the post. Tickets were closed as Done when content owners did not respond after guidance and next-step expectations had been communicated.

Source Tickets (2)
40. Meeting/lecture recordings uploaded to SharePoint showed 'this video has no audio'
70% confidence
Problem Pattern

Recorded meeting/lecture videos uploaded to SharePoint were reported to have no audio and opened with the message 'this video has no audio.' Symptoms varied: some participants heard audio live or in tests while the reporter's recordings had no sound. Systems involved included the meeting/recording service, SharePoint, and a MacBook.

Solution

The user re-recorded the meeting; the new recording contained audio and resolved the issue. The original failure could not be reproduced after the re-recording.

Source Tickets (1)
41. Limited SharePoint experience when Office Graph / Delve is disabled at tenant level
90% confidence
Problem Pattern

Users saw a stripped-down SharePoint UI with the error "You're seeing a limited version of this page because Office Graph is turned off. Learn more about turning on Office Graph." The page prevented end users from re-enabling Office Graph and indicated that only administrators could change the setting. Affected systems included SharePoint Online, Office Graph / Delve, and tenant-level Microsoft 365 settings.

Solution

Tenant administrators verified that Delve / Office Graph had been intentionally disabled at the tenant level and confirmed that the limited SharePoint experience was expected behavior. Administrators decided not to re-enable Office Graph for security and policy reasons, informed the user of that decision, and provided alternative guidance about seeking administrative approval if a business case for enabling Office Graph existed.

Source Tickets (1)
42. Preventing accidental edits and column schema drift in SharePoint Lists
80% confidence
Problem Pattern

Users reported frequent accidental or unintended edits to individual SharePoint list columns and frequent addition/removal of columns (schema drift). Built-in list versioning alone did not stop incorrect edits; PowerApps forms and Power Platform integrations were involved and potentially contributed to overwrites. Affected systems included SharePoint Lists, custom PowerApps forms, and Dataverse/Power Platform connections.

Solution

The issue was resolved by consolidating ownership and locking down how data was edited: critical lists were migrated to Dataverse where row/field-level security was available and the default SharePoint form was replaced with a controlled PowerApps form that exposed only approved editable fields. For lists that remained in SharePoint, schema changes were restricted via content types and site/list ownership clarification, choice columns and SharePoint column validation were applied to reduce invalid entries, and list-level versioning was retained. A Power Automate flow was added to capture change events, notify owners of unexpected edits, and automatically revert harmful changes using the list version history when necessary. End-user guidance and a single-maintainer model for schema changes accompanied the technical controls.

Source Tickets (1)
43. Site storage capacity blocking uploads and form submissions
80% confidence
Problem Pattern

A specific SharePoint site reported insufficient storage and users were unable to submit or register thesis submissions. Symptoms included blocked uploads/registrations for the site IUG-AbgabeAbschlussarbeitenDesignstudien with no explicit error code; the site inventory showed ~1.5 TB of content. Power Automate flows and downstream systems (CAMA) were implicated but no single failing file upload was available to reproduce the error.

Solution

No immediate technical fix was applied in the ticket. Support staff recorded the site usage (approximately 1.4–1.5 TB), confirmed there was no reproducible single-file failure sample, and escalated the situation to storage/capacity owners for archival, cleanup, or quota remediation decisions. The case remained documented for follow-up actions by the storage governance team.

Source Tickets (1)
44. Intermittent SharePoint and Power BI platform performance degradation
70% confidence
Problem Pattern

Users experienced intermittent severe performance degradation across SharePoint pages and related services including Power BI. Symptoms included very slow page loads, repeated 'Page is not reachable' errors until multiple refreshes, and slow or stalled file opening (Excel) from SharePoint hubs that sometimes succeeded on retry; the problem affected multiple browsers and multiple users since 2025-07-15.

Solution

Initial client-side troubleshooting (including testing in Microsoft Edge private mode and cross-browser checks) did not improve the symptoms. The incident was treated as a platform-level performance problem and was escalated to the tenant/platform service owners for deeper investigation of intermittent service degradation affecting SharePoint and Power BI; no client-side remediation resolved the issue during the documented troubleshooting.

Source Tickets (1)
45. SharePoint edit access requests routed through non-admin support and pending approval
90% confidence
Problem Pattern

Users requested Edit/write permissions for a SharePoint site or its child subsites and saw approval workflows (Automation for Jira/Jira) show the request as pending. Requesters reported they lacked edit access when attempting to open or modify site pages. Frontline support teams were unable to grant permissions because the SharePoint site owner was unknown or not listed, or because support lacked site-administration rights for that SharePoint area.

Solution

Requests were resolved when SharePoint site owners or site administrators granted Edit permissions on the requested site and explicitly propagated or assigned those permissions to child subsites; access was verified and tickets were closed. Where a site owner was unknown or a Website Owner entry was missing, requests remained pending in the Automation for Jira approval workflow; support forwarded such cases to a specialist team, advised the requester to contact Site Page Owners, or helped identify the appropriate site owner. Frontline support repeatedly reported that they did not have site-administration privileges for restricted SharePoint areas and therefore could not assign permissions; in a few cases support later granted the requested editing rights but did not document the exact technical steps or the identity of the person who changed the permissions.

46. Page- or site-level SharePoint access requests that support cannot grant (owner must assign)
90% confidence
Problem Pattern

Authenticated users received 'Access Denied' or could not obtain edit rights for specific SharePoint pages, subpages, folders, or embedded Forms despite signing in. Incidents affected individual users or small groups and were traced to page- or site-level ownership or Full Control being held by a specific owner account, mailbox, service account, or a former employee's account. Support staff lacked tenant or site-owner privileges to change those owner-managed permissions, so affected areas remained inaccessible to requesters.

Solution

Support validated users' Access Denied or inability-to-edit symptoms and confirmed they did not have tenant- or site-owner privileges to change page-, page-section-, or site-level permissions. Investigations repeatedly found ownership or Full Control assigned to a specific owner account, closed/disabled mailbox, service account, or a former employee’s account. Support recorded that only the named site/page owner, the responsible office (for example an exams office), or the manager of the service account/mailbox had the authority to reassign permissions or grant edit rights. Where a service account or mailbox owned the resource, agents noted that credential or ownership changes required coordination with the teams that managed that account. In one observed case involving Microsoft Forms, administrators could not transfer Forms ownership while the original owner’s account remained active during offboarding; the transfer path required the owner account to be disabled per the offboarding process. Support requested site links or owner contact details when available, provided callers with these findings and next-step contacts, and performed no permission changes themselves; several tickets were closed after no further requester response.

47. HR network drive migration to a dedicated HR SharePoint site and site governance
80% confidence
Problem Pattern

A partially completed migration of an HR network drive to SharePoint left additional data needing relocation because an external retention tool could not model required 10-year retention periods. Questions remained about timing, responsibilities, and ensuring long-term deletion/retention behavior for HR documents.

Solution

A dedicated SharePoint site for HR was provisioned and the HR drive transfer was completed and verified. Secure site sharing settings were configured and site ownership and permissions were assigned (site owners listed in the ticket). These actions centralized HR documents into a controlled SharePoint site where access control and retention policies could be managed going forward.

Source Tickets (1)
48. SharePoint list 'Edit view' dialog failed with unexpected error; recreate list as workaround
60% confidence
Problem Pattern

Users encountered an unexpected error when opening the 'Edit view' dialog on a SharePoint list that had been created from an existing list. The error message indicated an unexpected error and suggested running SharePoint Foundation troubleshooting; the view editor could not be opened across multiple browsers and sessions, while column add/remove within the list still worked.

Solution

The issue was treated as a list-level corruption/bug. A practical workaround that restored full view-edit functionality was to recreate the list (create a new list and migrate the items/columns) rather than attempting to repair the inherited view configuration. After recreating the list, users could open the Edit view dialog and modify filters, defaults, and advanced view settings again.

Source Tickets (1)
Back to Summaries
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload X